W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2007

RE: [RDFa] Wrap up of XMLLiteral issue

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:33:31 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D298520108DAC9@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: "RDFa" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Mark, Ivan,

Thanks a lot for your comments. I try to gather all of the
ideas at [1]. At the next telecon, we might be able to resolve
the outstanding issues.

@Ben: Can we have an agenda item for this, please?

>  'is @property present (on any element) or @name present (on <meta>)'
>
>could it not? That's essentially how you establish whether you have a
>literal. If @property/@name is not present then just exit, i.e., we
>don't need to mention URIs and such like.

Absolutely right. It might be even better to remove this first step from
here and include it into a 'parent' process chart, where all steps
(establishing
S, P, O) are shown. When time allows, I'll do that till next telecon ;)

Cheers,
	Michael


[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/LiteralObject#Note1Issues

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
>Mark Birbeck
>Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 2:06 PM
>To: RDFa
>Subject: Re: [RDFa] Wrap up of XMLLiteral issue
>
>
>Nice work Michael. It looks fine to me, with only one question; should
>we _always_ use the language when establishing plain literals? My
>feeling is that we should, but you only have it at the bottom of the
>flow, and not on the right. Was that a conscious decision? I.e., do
>you feel that @content should behave differently to inline text with
>no mark-up?
>
>Actually, just looked again, and I have one more question...the first
>step could just be:
>
>  'is @property present (on any element) or @name present (on <meta>)'
>
>could it not? That's essentially how you establish whether you have a
>literal. If @property/@name is not present then just exit, i.e., we
>don't need to mention URIs and such like.
>
>But other than that, it's very nice. :)
>
>On 12/04/07, Hausenblas, Michael 
><michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ben, All,
>>
>> Motivated by our yesterday's resolution regarding XMLLiteral [1],
>> I now tried to sketch the current status. I thought the best way
>> to do this is to draw a process chart ;)
>>
>> What I basically did, was trying to apply the rules from the
>> current section '5.1 Literals as Objects' of the RDFa syntax
>> document [2] along with the agreed upon hybrid approach w.r.t.
>> XMLLiteral.
>>
>> The result is available on our Wiki entitled 
>'RDFa/LiteralObject' [3].
>>
>> I'm in doubt that I got everything right, so please feel free to
>> go to the Wiki page [3] and add comments, questions, etc.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>         Michael
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/11-rdfa-minutes.html
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/LiteralObject
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>>  Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
>>
>>  <office>
>>     phone: +43-316-876-1193 (fax:-1191)
>>    e-mail: michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at
>>       web: http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
>>
>>  <private>
>>    mobile: +43-660-7621761
>>       web: http://www.sw-app.org/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer
>
>  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
>  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com
>
>  standards. innovation.
>
>
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2007 14:29:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:04 GMT