W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2007

Re: XHTML-RDFa draft made public

From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:57:06 -0400
Message-ID: <461CCD12.1040407@torrez.us>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, HTML WG <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>

>>> - I also have the impression that we got to a nice equilibrium point on
>>> the literal datatype discussion on the mailing list (see the thread
>>> starting at [1]), but this is not reflected in the document (maybe I
>>> have just missed it).
>> There has been a lot of discussion on this in two or three subsequent
>> telecons, and the equilibrium that was reached was unfortunately a
>> negative one; that we would lose something whichever side we came down
>> on. We were therefore waiting for an action item from Elias to be
>> completed, which would identify what the problems with the _current_
>> solution are from the point of view of triple stores, and then
>> hopefully we can wrap this up one way or the other.

I have not had time to attend the meetings, let alone do my todo on
investigating many ontologies to find the most used. I wasn't worried
because I too thought that we were aiming at consensus on the new style
and not the current. Where are we/you on this? current or new hybrid

> Oh, not again...:-) I really liked what we ended up with, it looked like
> a perfect base for a consensus...

Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:57:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:22 UTC