Hello, On 30/04/06, Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu> wrote: > > This week's brainstorm and hacking session with DanC yielded some > very interesting ideas, including a promising direction for providing > a path from Microformats to RDFa. As a result, I'm proposing hGRDDL, > a GRDDL-like way to transform Microformats into RDFa. It seems this > approach may resolve a core adoption issue: MFs are being deployed, > but RDFa is ultimately the way we want applications to deal with > metadata, and as MF authors realize that MFs are not extensible, > they'll want an upgrade path. > Since we need a validator for each microformat, I suppose we'll need one for the micromodel expressed in RDF/A? I think that by hGRDDL and a micromodel validator we can provide validation for microformats too, and not to have multiple validators for the same abstract model. Thanks, -- Laurian Gridinoc, purl.org/net/laurReceived on Sunday, 14 May 2006 21:47:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:02 GMT