W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > March 2006

RE: 8 points for GRDDL (output other than RDF/XML?)

From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:33:21 +0000
To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
Cc: newsml-2@yahoogroups.com
Message-id: <A29ADE959C70A1449470AA9A212F5D8001523E7D@LONSMSXM06.emea.ime.reuters.com>

On 9 March, Dan wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 16:27 +0100, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> > Hi Misha,
> > 
> > Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 15:00 +0000, Misha Wolf a écrit :
> > > [re GRDDL]
> > > 6. do not limit rdf/xml as output

[...]

> > With regard to RDF non-XML serializations, I don't think any use 
> > case has been expressed to support such an option; do you have 
> > one to suggest?
> 
> That's a good question; I don't recall any specific answers from
> the discussion in France.

1.  IIRC, RDF/XML does not support numeric terms.
2.  A large number of taxonomies used by the News industry use 
    numeric terms.
=>  RDF/XML does not work for the News industry.

Misha
------------------- NewsML 2 resources ------------------------------
http://www.iptc.org/        | http://www.iptc.org/NAR/
http://www.iptc.org/NAR/1.0 | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-2/


To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Friday, 10 March 2006 12:51:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:01 GMT