- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:54:02 -0600
- To: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, newsml-2@yahoogroups.com
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:22 +0000, Misha Wolf wrote: > In seeking to formulate a proposal to the NewsML 2 Architecture WP > for how we should make use of RDDL and GRDDL, I am struck by the > different approaches taken by these two specs to linking to > resources. Presumably, there is no reason why not to use the RDDL > approach to link to GRDDL transforms (instead of the approach > proposed in the GRDDL spec). The approaches overlap; I've written RDDL documents that are also GRDDL documents. The GRDDL profile itself used to use RDDL; I found it hard to maintain, so I switched to Embedded RDF; perhaps I should go back in CVS-time, grab that RDDL example, and make an example of it... perhaps in the GRDDL test suite, perhaps elsewhere. Meanwhile, I'm interested to know... what differences looked important to you? > If we were to do this, we would wish > to use some agreed natures/purposes. Is anyone interested in > defining these? I am, inasmuch as RDDL natures/purposes are just RDF properties. p.s. I'm replying to all 3 lists, including newsml-2@yahoogroups.com , though the last few times I copied that list, I got a notice that I'm not authorized to post there. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2006 15:54:11 UTC