On 19/06/2006 03:12, Karl Dubost wrote: > > Hmmm :) > I don't think you disagree that much Ian and Mark, quite the opposite > but with a different scope. And it's why it's very important to specify > the version of XHTML/HTML you are using in all cases. > > * What Ian is proposing in > Towards Copy and Paste eRDF > June 13, 2006 @ 6:37 pm > http://iandavis.com/blog/2006/06/towards-copy-and-paste-erdf > is a mechanism which makes it usable with HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0. Actually this thread doesn't concern eRDF at all. What I'm interested in is why RDFa uses qnames, which I've shown to be fragile, when the following would work just as well and be robust when used with all current XML tools: <span property="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/date" type="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date" content="2006-01-02"> > > * Mark is proposing a system which is only usable with XHTML 2.0 > That's not relevant to this discussion. RDFa needs new markup so it can't be XHTML 1.0. Hopefully it'll be expressible as an XHTML module. Ian -- http://purl.org/NET/iand Blogging at... http://iandavis.com/blog Working on... http://directory.talis.com/Received on Monday, 19 June 2006 07:17:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:02 GMT