Le 06-06-18 à 20:59, Mark Birbeck a écrit : > the XSLT lists; the only reason I feel compelled to keep responding is > that the underlying assumption of your points is that we need to drop > QName use from XHTML. (RDFa is just one use of QNames in XHTML 2.) Hmmm :) I don't think you disagree that much Ian and Mark, quite the opposite but with a different scope. And it's why it's very important to specify the version of XHTML/HTML you are using in all cases. * What Ian is proposing in Towards Copy and Paste eRDF June 13, 2006 @ 6:37 pm http://iandavis.com/blog/2006/06/towards-copy-and-paste-erdf is a mechanism which makes it usable with HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0. * Mark is proposing a system which is only usable with XHTML 2.0 Each time, you are discussing, it would be better to state clearly your scopes. (PS: I'm not taking position for one or the other solution) -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Monday, 19 June 2006 02:11:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:02 GMT