Re: [ALL] RDF/A Primer Version

The [1] reference was meant to point to:

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006-01-24-rdfa-primer

-Ben

On Jan 27, 2006, at 2:01 PM, Ben Adida wrote:

>
>
> [... much useful discussion ...]
>
> Thank you all for these very useful comments. I have added warnings  
> in Sections 2 and 3 of the RDF/A Primer (2006-01-24) [1].
>
> I would like to ask for some clarification on one issue so we can  
> narrow down the source of the debate. I'm particularly worried  
> about the implication that a URI with a # in it cannot be used to  
> reference a non-information-resource entity if the containing URI  
> (without a #) is an XHTML document.
>
> Specifically, here's an alternative way to present the FOAF  
> metadata in RDF/A:
>
> =========
> <html>
> 	<head><title>Ben Adida's Page</title></head>
> 	<body>
> 	<p about="#me">
> 		Welcome to my <a rel="foaf:homepage">homepage</a>.
> 		You can contact me at <span property="foaf:mbox">ben@mit.edu</span>.
> 	</p>
> 	</body>
> </html>
> =========
>
> which would yield the triples:
>
> <#me> foaf:homepage <>.
> <#me> foaf:mbox "ben@mit.edu".
>
> Is this still wrong according to the TAG, because the <> URI  
> resolves to an XHTML document and thus <#me> cannot be a  
> foaf:person? That is what I understood from Alistair's early email.  
> I want to point out that, if that is the case, then as Mark  
> described, that is seriously problematic for RDF/A whose goal it is  
> to describe the document that is actually carrying the RDF/A itself.
>
> -Ben
>

Received on Friday, 27 January 2006 19:05:54 UTC