- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:41:30 -0600
- To: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
- Cc: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 00:03 -0500, Ben Adida wrote: > On Feb 1, 2006, at 12:58 PM, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: [...] > DanC's FOAF Person URI is <http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/#me>, > but <http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/> returns HTML, which makes > <http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/#me> a (potential) HTML element. > > DBooth, I thought you were saying that this is probably a bad thing, > assuming HTMLElement subclasses InformationResource, etc... > > Did I misunderstand? > > If DanC's setup is okay by the TAG, I don't think the TAG endorses what I'm doing there. The most relevant TAG issues are still open. http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#fragmentInXML-28 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#abstractComponentRefs-37 I'm starting to think that the profile attribute is key: if you get an HTML representation of /baseballplayers with <div id="peterose"> then baseballplayers#peterose identifies that div element, unless the author says otherwise using the <head profile> element. This is a post-hoc refinement of the html media types and the XHTML specs; i.e. I think those specs should be ammendmended to specify this practice. > then I *think* that means that a > secondary resource can be a non-information resource, even when its > primary resource is an information resource. Someone correct me if > I've lost it. > > -Ben -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 14:41:42 UTC