Re: GRDDL and XHTML 2.0

On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 22:31 +0200, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Le vendredi 11 août 2006 à 09:58 -0500, Dan Connolly a écrit :
[...]
> > And what's wrong with the attribute?
> 
> Your documents do not validate against the XHTML 2.0 schema.

Really? Felgercarb. :-|

Maybe I can get that fixed.


> > > Also, I think that generally speaking, imposing a foreign attribute in
> > > XML is very intrusive: what if you are using a vocabulary that does not
> > > allow foreign namespace attributes?
> > 
> > Can you think of any important examples?
> 
> I wish more vocabularies could allow foreign attributes,

I assumed they did. Sigh.

Thanks for the data points.

>  but it seems to
> be the exception rather than the rule!
> 
> XHTML 2.0, ODF, NITF, and DocBook come to mind.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E