W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2006

RE: Do CURIEs represent a (namespace, localname) pair?

From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:31:46 +0100
To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-id: <A29ADE959C70A1449470AA9A212F5D8001ABBC2E@LONSMSXM06.emea.ime.reuters.com>

Hi Ralph,

> Do you have an opinion on what you want a CURIE
> syntax to represent?  Do you want CURIEs to have
> any kind of namespace semantics?  Do you want all
> CURIEs to have these semantics or only when the
> containing document type is of a class that explicitly
> adds such semantics to CURIEs?  I suppose that
> the semantics "all URIs that have this string as their
> first (left) part" is a kind of "namespace" semantics
> but I'd prefer to call that something else, such as 
> "URI prefix".

Speaking only for Reuters and the IPTC, we are dealing with 
taxonomies, and very much intend to treat the left part as 
a URI representing the taxonomy, and the left and right 
parts together as representing a term in the taxonomy.  We 
intend that these URIs be dereferencable and that they be 
usable for constructing RDF triples.  Indeed, we have 
provided an XSLT transform which converts a subset of 
NewsML 2 metadata to N3.  Hence, we do perceive our use of 
CURIEs as representing namespaces, and terms in these 
namespaces.

I should add, in order to get all the heretical stuff out 
in the open, that we have no intention of using xmlns 
declarations to associate the left side with a URI.  So we 
most definitely do not perceive CURIEs (as used by us) as 
representing XML namespaces.

Misha
------------------- NewsML 2 resources ------------------------------
http://www.iptc.org/        | http://www.iptc.org/NAR/
http://www.iptc.org/NAR/1.0 | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-2/


To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 21:32:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:01 GMT