W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2006

Re: New RDFa Primer Draft (calendar details)

From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:22:09 -0400
Message-Id: <E7E3D60A-44CB-4885-9B04-35E9D2F2FCDA@mit.edu>
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>


Thanks for the comments.

>   <meta property="cal:dtstart" content="20060508T1000-0500">
> iCalendar doesn't allow 20060508T1000-0500 as a dtstart,
> and neither does http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical .


>     <dtstart rdf:parseType='Resource'>
>      <dateTime>2002-06-30T09:00:00</dateTime>
>      <tzid>/softwarestudio.org/Olson_20011030_5/America/New_York</ 
> tzid>
>     </dtstart>

That's unfortunate, though I see why, in pure RDF land, this is a  
good idea.

It might be interesting to think about simpler RDF properties for  
these kinds of tools, RDF properties that mirror the MF properties  
more closely. I'm thinking this is especially possible since the  
vCard clients can already consume the literal we're thinking about.

> The newer schema is http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/icaltzd
> It models timezones as datatypes, which is an idea that I'm not
> sure is going to stick. But it looks like:
> <dtstart rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/tzd/America/ 
> New_York#tz">2002-06-30T09:00:00</dtstart>

Yeah, that seems like an abuse of type inheritance....

> I see you cite the RDF calendar workspace; it might be better
> to cite the IG Note:
> RDF Calendar - an application of the Resource Description Framework to
> iCalendar Data
> W3C Interest Group Note 29 September 2005
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfcal/

Fixed the reference.

So, not sure how to proceed on this one. It seems like some simpler  
RDF properties would be useful, especially if the existing tools can  
already handle the literal we want. What do you think?

Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 00:22:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:20 UTC