W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > April 2006

Re: change to abstention on multiple CURIE question

From: Ben Adida <ben@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 18:22:35 -0400
Message-Id: <E8E2727E-1BBD-4B3C-B51E-3B663C96FC10@mit.edu>
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>


Ralph,

I understand that you have to go with the W3C staff consensus, but  
this issue seems different from supporting CURIEs. At an abstract  
level, whatever the type of a REL,REV,PROPERTY is, should it be  
plural or singular? It seems to me that we can argue about the  
specific CURIE type separately.

-Ben

On Apr 4, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Ralph R. Swick wrote:

>
> Regarding yesterday's item 6. Multiple values in 'rel' [1],
> there is not W3C staff consensus on the CURIE proposal in
> general.  As I have done in previous discussions regarding
> further use of CURIEs [2], I must abstain rather than
> appear to be in favor of the proposal on behalf of the Team.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/04/03-htmltf-minutes#item06
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/13-htmltf-minutes#item04
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2006 22:22:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:01 GMT