W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > November 2005

Re: Comments on RDF/A Syntax (Editor's Draft 27 October 2005)

From: Jeremy Wong 黃泓量 <jeremy@miko.hk>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:16:48 +0800
Message-ID: <004e01c5f437$258aa8f0$0100a8c0@wongc63b9a507d>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Cc: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>


Can you predict how many RDF triples, from all XML documents of the world 
today, you can obtain using your approach?

If I did not know RDF/XML, I would not use those RDF/XML facilities in my 
XML files. If I know RDF/XML, I have my metadata prepared in RDF proper. 
Simply using GRDDL helps a lot from extracting RDF triples from existing XML 

Jeremy Wong

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Cc: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: Comments on RDF/A Syntax (Editor's Draft 27 October 2005)

> On Nov 28, 2005, at 9:27 AM, Mark Birbeck wrote:
>> If it did it using RDF/XML then obviously the parsing would start 
>> earlier,
>> and if it did it using some other language, then there's not much the
>> RDF/XML parser can do about it--you'd need some prior knowledge that this
>> was going to be the case.
> No, on the contrary, without prior knowledge, we must assume that
> the containing XML document may quote/refute the included XML.
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 28 November 2005 16:17:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:19 UTC