W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2005

Re: GRDDL-enabling microformats

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 08:13:01 -0500
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, tantek@technorati.com
Message-Id: <1116594781.3429.291.camel@localhost>

On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 13:47 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
> Hi Danny,
> Le vendredi 20 mai 2005 ŗ 11:52 +0200, Danny Ayers a ťcrit :
> > If I understand the new GRDDL draft [1] correctly, a compatible
> > document would firstly include a reference to the data-view profile to
> > say "transformations of this doc have the same meaning as this doc" -
> > <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view"> 
> > 
> > This would be the same for all microformats.
> Actually, this is even more flexible than that; you don't need to get
> all microformats to adopt the GRDDL profile; as long as they do have a
> profile (as XFN does), then you can put the relevant information
> directly in the profile document itself, and all the documents
> referencing this profile would become GRDDLable.
> To take the XFN example in more details:

This example is explained and illustrated in the spec...
"Analogously, consider a profile document whose information content
includes ..."

The example there is "real" in that it's available in the web:


See also the N3 behind the diagram...

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
see you at XTech in Amsterdam 24-27 May?
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 13:13:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:19 UTC