On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 07:48 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: [...] > I was interested enough in GRDDL to try implementing it, as I think > getting semantics out of xhtml1 (and xml) is important enough to > continue the GRDDL approach, while other things such as RDF/A are > moving on for xhtml2+. > > So, if some effort is needed I think I may offer help as co-editor > if I can slot it in with my DAWG work and also trying to get > Turtle into some kind of Note too. That sounds interesting! > What are the goals for GRDDL in the short term - timescales, > expected document status (WG note?), community review? Good question... Meanwhile, as the GRDDL Note was long overdue for an update and it doesn't yet have a home WG, I started the ball rolling on the "team submission" process, and it culminated yesterday in... http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2005/SUBM-grddl-20050516/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E see you at XTech in Amsterdam 24-27 May?Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:04:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:59 GMT