Hello public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf, In section 3 of GRDDL (I was reading the 13 April 2004 version) http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/#grddl-xml The first two paragraphs seem to contradict each other >> The GRDDL profile mechanism is a special case of GRDDL designed to >> fit within the syntax of XHTML 1.0. The general form of GRDDL is an >> attribute suitable for use with a wide variety of XML dialects. OK, cool, so I read on to find out how to do that ... >> Use of the interpreter attribute in the >> http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view# namespace on the root element of >> an XML document indicates that RDF statements that result from >> transformation of the HTML document to RDF by designated algorithms >> are part of the document's meaning. "the HTML document"? What if my XML is *not* HTML? Is 'the HTML document' just a typo? To be specific, how would I change this example http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/metadata.html#Example to say that the content of the metadata element is part of the documents meaning? Do I merely add xmlns:grddl="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#" grddl:interpreter="what, exactly, goes here" I read >> The value of the grddl:interpreter attribute designates a list of >> algorithms by URI reference It seems to point to an xsl stylesheet, not a list of algorithms. I would also like to know how to GRDDLize these examples http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/coords.html#GeographicCoordinates if that turns out to be different. Please note also that SVG is structured, so a single SVG document instance can have several logical parts and each of these can have its own metadata element. How do I indicate that the metadata applies to just a particular part of the document (ie, the parent of the metadata element? -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity LeadReceived on Monday, 21 March 2005 14:58:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:59 GMT