W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > February 2005

Re: TAG is talking about RDDL->RDF again

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:27:07 -0600
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: RDF in XHTML task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1109179627.4991.1109.camel@localhost>

On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 11:59 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:
> * Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> [2005-02-23 09:58-0600]
> > 
> > This is one of the more important RDF/XHTML use cases, I think.
> 
> While I'm not questioning that, I do admit to near total 
> ignorance re the extent of RDDL deployment. Are there any, 
> many etc namespaces using RDDL docs at the moment? Tools 
> to consume/interpret RDDL, etc?

Er... yeah... I left out rather important link...
Henry runs the W3C XML Schema validation service,
and he added RDDL support to it.

Also, when the TAG was talking about newish RDDL
designs, some users of the older XLink-based designs
piped up...

Re: RDDL2 Background Eric van der Vlist (Tuesday, 2 March)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Mar/thread.html

that thread goes back in www-tag to January 2004...
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jan/thread.html#42
... and seems to go back further in xml-dev, though
I haven't followed that part of the trail.

> Dan
> 
> > RDDL->RDF Henry S. Thompson (Tuesday, 22 February) 
> >       * Re: RDDL->RDF  Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 22 February)
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Feb/thread.html#205

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 17:27:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:59 GMT