Mark on my detailed read of section 4 I came away feeling that there were a few too many rules. It felt that in the desire to have flexibility in expression the other goal of some parsimony got lost. I'm wondering if some of the rules can be removed, losing some of the least useful power ... e.g. how about: keeping the subject resolution rules having the object for @property determined by @content or ./(*|text()) (hmm want to keep PIs and comments too) having the object for @rel determined by @href or the subject of each child element (one triple per child) [subject of child element not resolved by reference to parent element, if no @about or @nodeID then a gensym associated with child element] for @rev subject and object of @rel are swapped. if [@content][not(@property)] then implicit @property='hasReferenceTo' if [@href][not(@rel)][not(@rev)] then implicit @rel='hasReferenceTo' (although I would prefer the two implicit relations to be different) Dropping the predicate inheritance rules. JeremyReceived on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 10:00:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:59 GMT