- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:07:57 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, "'public-rdf-in-xhtml task force''" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Sorry for this dribble of comments, I am thinking of implementing RDF/A
and that always raises a load of issues ...
>
> The initial para of 4.4.3 seems clear enough on this one:
>
> [[
> During the processing of each statement, a check is made on the [context
> statement] to see if it has a predicate but no object. If it does, then
> a triple is generated which has the subject and predicate provided by
> the [context statement], but with the object set to the subject of the
> statement being evaluated.
> ]]
>
A further thought this para is slightly unclear with the following test case
<blockquote id="y" >
<link rel="eg:foo">
<link about="#x"/>
</link>
</blockquote>
I think that gets me
<BASE#y> eg:foo <BASE#x> .
when evaluating line 3, but the subject, evaluated as the subject of the
context statement, is in fact the subject of it's context statement ...
I would be happy either way with this, but I don't find the text isn't
clear on this one.
Also editorial point, the use of 'statement' in [context statement] and
[current statement] seems confusing, how about using 'element' or 'node'.
(Neither the context statement nor the current statement is an RDF
statement, but both are XML elements; they often result in an RDF triple
being produced but ... not always)
Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2004 15:08:19 UTC