Hello, DanC and I were chatting yesterday about relative URIs resolutions in the RDF/XML output of a GRDDL transformation; for instance, if a GRDDL transformation applied on http://example.net/foo/bar outputs <rdf:Description rdf:about="../"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://example.net/aCoolResource" /> </rdf:Description> how should the relative URI "../" be interpreted? We agreed that the most logical answer was to assume that base URI for the resulting RDF/XML should be by default the URI of the input document; this needs to be captured in the next revision of the specification (or discussed if people disagree with this approach). FWIW, that's the current behavior of the GRDDL demonstrator [1]: it adds an xml:base attribute on the root rdf:RDF element set to the URI of the input. Dom 1. http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/grddl-xml-demo -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.orgReceived on Friday, 5 November 2004 10:21:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:59 GMT