Re: let's specify meaning rather than processing

Le sam 17/01/2004 à 00:00, Dan Connolly a écrit :
> That was a great start. After working thru various technical
> details (grokRDDL and such) I found some inspiration to do
> some writing today. What do you think of this new draft?

Looks great! (FWIW, I've fixed a few typos spotted by ,spell)

> Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of Languages (GRDDL)

My only concern with title (or rather its acronym) is that it is really
close to RDDL, which might generate some confusion; but that's probably
not a big deal.


> > In addition to the changes evoked above, I've also started to add 
> > the generalization to XML,
>
> Is that bit implemented? I guess I could try it and see...
> let's make some tests.

I'm willing to make the XSLT coding if provided with an existing XML
document mapped into RDF.

> >  plus the definition of the RDF property Tim
> > requested to link an XML Namespace to an interpreter; let me know if you
> > think I've captured it adequately.
> 
> I haven't finished digesting that idea; haven't written
> any code/tests/working-examples using it yet.

Neither have I; maybe Tim could give his thoughts/ideas on that?

Dom
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org