W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > June 2003

Proposal: Simply specify a XHTML lax, or XHTML+RDF Namespace and Schema

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 15:23:15 -0400
To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Cc: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200306201523.15789.reagle@w3.org>

To put a point on Mimasa's work with a potentially rash proposal: why not 
just specify a XHTML+RDF or XHTML-lax namespace and schema and ask people 
to use that? Problem solved!?

Mimasa has already provided the XHTML-lax schema, I even have it running as 
an (temporary) experimental validator at:
  http://policy.w3.org/xsd-xhtml1-validate

What objection would the HTML or RDF communities likely raise? If none, is 
it just a matter of assigning the action to do it, and to find the 
resources to maintain a validator service?
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 15:23:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:58 GMT