On Monday 09 June 2003 19:59, Phil Ringnalda wrote: > http://philringnalda.com/blog/2002/08/trackback_and_validation_summary.ph >p a better intro to TrackBack and validation, since my blood pressure was > down, it's also the genesis of how my site is "valid" with embedded RDF: > I cloak. Thanks Phil, I hadn't noticed that URL before, and my hopes are now dashed that some cool solution had appeared that made the RDF validate -- instead of the validator being content negotiated to. <smile/> Given that I seemed to have assessed your requirements correctly te [Trackback] annotations on the requirements stand [1], I hope to gather more scenarios/comments from other members of the task force, and also to hear back from some HTML folks about possible plans (both short term, and potential long term) for addressing some of the requirements. [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdf-in-xml.htmlReceived on Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:57:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:58 GMT