- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:32:37 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 27/03/13 13:08, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On 03/27/2013 07:13 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> >> On 26/03/13 22:14, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>> Okay, here's my plan: >>> >>> 1. I've moved the errata document to errata.html in the group's CVS >>> tree. So all the editors can now update it. That access isn't likely >>> to go away. (It's available on the Web at >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata since that's what the RECs point >>> to) >> >> I'm still having problems with that page. >> >> cvs -d :ext:aseaborne@cvs.w3.org:/w3ccvs co WWW/2013/sparql-errata.html >> >> gives one line: >> >> cvs checkout: warning: new-born `WWW/2013/sparql-errata.html' has >> disappeared >> >> > > The page to edit is WWW/2009/sparql/errata.html which is in the normal > SPARQL tree you're used to editing, I believe. Works (you hadn't mentioned the WWW/2009/sparql !!) > I created a rewrite rule to make that file also be served at > http://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata > > Make sense? Not all the editors are signed up to this. Maybe they want to get away! On the 5-6 business days timescale is too short - editors are volunteers here. This can't be a priority for me so it's happen when it happens. Hence the wiki page idea - capture for later. Andy
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 13:33:08 UTC