W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2013

RE: going to REC

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:20:52 +0100
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, SPARQL WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE801643346A04B@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
As far as I can see, the only significant post-PR change is:

  $Log: xmlspec.xml,v $
  Revision 1.86  2012-12-17 17:09:27  gwilliam
  Removed unused scovo prefix in examples.

in (service description) which is editorial... see
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/service-description-1.1/xmlspec.xml

BTW: I don't find the reply to 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0005.html 
linked in our archives... I think I remember we discussed at some point that the comment was implemented in the editor's draft, but I don't see the reply anywhere linked on our list.

Best,
Axel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org]
> Sent: Montag, 18. März 2013 14:16
> To: SPARQL WG
> Subject: going to REC
> 
> I'm hoping the RECs will go out tomorrow.
> 
> Has anyone made any changes since PR?   (I'll double check, but I'll
> need an explanation)
> 
> Does anyone know of any problems or any reason to wait?
> 
> Does anyone have any nice text saying how great SPARQL 1.1 is, for use in the
> announcement?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>        -- Sandro
> 
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 14:21:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:50 GMT