W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2013

RE: draft response TH-1 and suggest to remove www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:14:08 +0100
To: "lee@thefigtrees.net" <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE8015A1AECC149@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
Thanks for helping with tracking, had overlooked that one yesterday in the transition call (Ralph asked us to check back on those recent comments not closed, even if they weren't affecting the specs, for courtesy. This one seems sufficient, definitely, and I now added the link to the response on the comments page. Maybe it would be good to ask for a brief acknowledgement, but doesn't seem to be strictly necessary.



The only one missing then seems JS-1 (where the last message doesn't really seem to indicate acknowledgement). I will contact the commenter for an acknowledgement again and ask whether the last reply by Andy

 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Nov/0006.html

is sufficient (it seems that the message only went to the list)...



That seems to be all for comments.



Best,

Axel



p.s.: I think it is still potentially confusing to have www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl<http://www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl> sit around in the TR space.





From: Lee Feigenbaum [mailto:figtree@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
Sent: Donnerstag, 10. Jänner 2013 15:56
To: Polleres, Axel
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Subject: Re: draft response TH-1 and suggest to remove www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl



Is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0000.html an insufficient response?

Lee

On 1/10/2013 4:13 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:

Hi,



I am trying to close the last comments and have quickly drafted a response on TH-1:

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:TH-1



One question in this context, mostly @team:

 Shouldn't  we remove www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl<http://www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl> as it is no longer part of the official spec?

Maybe we can do that along the upcoming publication round.



Best,

Axel


Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich
CT RTC BAM CON-AT
Siemensstraße 90
1210 Wien, Österreich
Tel.: +43 51707-36983
Mobil: +43 664 88550859
mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com

Firma: Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich; Rechtsform: Aktiengesellschaft; Firmensitz: Wien; Firmenbuchnummer: FN 60562 m; Firmenbuchgericht: Handelsgericht Wien; DVR: 0001708
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 15:14:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:50 GMT