- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:25:23 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 10/01/13 09:13, Polleres, Axel wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to close the last comments and have quickly drafted a > response on TH-1: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:TH-1 +1 > One question in this context, mostly @team: > > Shouldn’t we remove > www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl > <http://www.w3.org/TR/sprot11/sparql-protocol-query-11.wsdl> as it is no > longer part of the official spec? > > Maybe we can do that along the upcoming publication round. Remove or return HTML to say "it's dead" -- at the very least update http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/ to say "it's dead" and generally - how do old specs get made so that users will not be confused inot thinking they are current?) Ditto TR/rdf-sparql-query/ Andy > > Best, > > Axel > > > Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich > CT RTC BAM CON-AT > Siemensstraße 90 > 1210 Wien, Österreich > Tel.: +43 51707-36983 > Mobil: +43 664 88550859 > mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com > > Firma: Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich; Rechtsform: > Aktiengesellschaft; Firmensitz: Wien; Firmenbuchnummer: FN 60562 m; > Firmenbuchgericht: Handelsgericht Wien; DVR: 0001708 >
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 09:25:52 UTC