W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:30:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CABt65Of4ybbmBDEBCbtbcxjtnbjfX=tcXk51mACgZZzdb=3LOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I'm not sure what to do with the two extra RIF tests. They are not
wrong, but test non-normative features. For the OWL WG we had optional
tests (ExtraCreditTests), so we could use something similar here,
leave them as NotClassified or remove them. I'm ok with all three
options, although I would prefer keeping them, e.g., as extra credit
or non-normative tests.

Birte

On 20 December 2012 19:41, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> Agree. The test should not have been marked approved.
>
> Le
>
>
> On 12/20/2012 1:29 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
>>
>>> - As I mentioned, the temporal-proximity-by-exclusion-minus-1 test is
>>> marked as approved, but commented out of the manifest list. I'm not sure
>>> what to do with it.
>>
>> After digging into this a bit deeper, I think this was my fault. The test
>> was approve here:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-01-31#resolution_3
>>
>> That resolution says "approve all non-approved test cases at
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/#sparql11-query". The state of
>> the implementation report at the time of that resolution is in CVS at r1.10,
>> and does *not* contain the temporal-proximity-by-exclusion-minus-1 test.
>> However, given the resolution text, I believe I went to the manifest and
>> marked all tests in the file as approved, regardless of whether they had
>> been commented out in the manifest list (which
>> temporal-proximity-by-exclusion-minus-1 had).
>>
>> So unless somebody objects, I'm going to remove the approval status from
>> that test (as it never should have been there in the first place), and then
>> adjust my working patch of the test suite to remove that test completely
>> (pending group approval on cleaning up the test suite of non-approved
>> tests).
>>
>> thanks,
>> .greg
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
Germany
Received on Friday, 21 December 2012 10:30:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT