W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email

From: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:00:33 -0500
To: birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <282BA0989143488FB54B3738C44F9F44@gmail.com>
+1 from me  

--  
Chime Ogbuji
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com)


On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Birte Glimm wrote:

> +1 from me to all proposals
>  
> Birte
>  
> On 18 December 2012 15:44, Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com (mailto:matthew.perry@oracle.com)> wrote:
> > +1 on all of these from me
> >  
> > - Matt
> >  
> >  
> > On 12/18/2012 5:29 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> >  
> > Reading the recent comments and mails, it sounds to me that we probably may
> > need at least to make some
> >  
> > decisions (mostly book-keeping). I don’t think that any of these issues
> > prevent us from publishing
> >  
> > as planned, but it would be good to have them clarified:
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > I see the following:
> >  
> > 1) Minor editorial fixes in drafts before publication
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0211.html
> >  
> > 2) Test suite bugs
> >  
> > 3) Removing uncommented test cases
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > I hope we can sort these things out per email, so I’m giving it a try,
> > please post your replies or comments to the following proposals to the list:
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in query as per
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0210.html
> >  
> > PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in Overview as per
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0209.html
> >  
> > PROPOSED: remove all unapproved test cases from the manifests (and move
> > them to a separate folder for “unapproved” test cases)
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > If a sufficient quorum has time and enthusiasm to gather on IRC today at the
> > regular time, maybe some of the things can be sorted out/further discussed
> > there quickly (unfortunately, I won’t be able to make it). Otherwise, just
> > in case, if we have any concerns on the proposals above which we can’t sort
> > out per email I suggest:
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > PROPOSED: Telco: 15 Jan 2013, Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US) …
> > if any of the proposals above raises objections
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > FWIW, I vote “+1” to all of the above.
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > Best regards,
> >  
> > Axel
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > p.s.: this does not yet contain any proposal on how to proceed with the
> > comment we got on the protocol validator, cf.
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0006.html
> > ... hope this will sorty out per email, if
> >  
> > someone more swapped in could take care, it’d be appreciated!
>  
>  
>  
> --  
> Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm Tel.: +49 731 50 24125
> Inst. of Artificial Intelligence Secr: +49 731 50 24258
> University of Ulm Fax: +49 731 50 24188
> D-89069 Ulm birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de (mailto:birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de)
> Germany
>  
>  
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 15:01:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT