W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email

From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:57:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CABt65Oe732th43H7Pd4W1Q_Ek8a3ybHr4KC7ekfsbDFrLW5zRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
+1 from me to all proposals

Birte

On 18 December 2012 15:44, Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com> wrote:
> +1 on all of these from me
>
> - Matt
>
>
> On 12/18/2012 5:29 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:
>
> Reading the recent comments and mails, it sounds to me that we probably may
> need at least to make some
>
> decisions (mostly book-keeping). I don’t think that any of these issues
> prevent us from publishing
>
> as planned, but it would be good to have them clarified:
>
>
>
> I see the following:
>
> 1)      Minor editorial fixes in drafts before publication
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0211.html
>
> 2)      Test suite bugs
>
> 3)      Removing uncommented test cases
>
>
>
> I hope we can sort these things out per email, so I’m giving it a try,
> please post your replies or comments to the following proposals to the list:
>
>
>
> PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in query as per
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0210.html
>
> PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in Overview as per
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0209.html
>
>  PROPOSED: remove all unapproved test cases from the manifests (and move
> them to a separate folder for “unapproved” test cases)
>
>
>
> If a sufficient quorum has time and enthusiasm to gather on IRC today at the
> regular time, maybe some of the things can be sorted out/further discussed
> there quickly (unfortunately, I won’t be able to make it). Otherwise, just
> in case, if we have any concerns on  the proposals above which we can’t sort
> out per email I suggest:
>
>
>
> PROPOSED:  Telco:  15 Jan 2013,  Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US) …
> if any of the proposals above raises objections
>
>
>
> FWIW, I vote “+1” to all of the above.
>
>
>
> Best  regards,
>
> Axel
>
>
>
> p.s.: this does not yet contain any proposal on how to proceed with the
> comment we got on the protocol validator, cf.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0006.html
> ... hope this will sorty out per email, if
>
> someone more swapped in could take care, it’d be appreciated!
>
>



-- 
Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
Germany
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 14:57:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT