W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: possible bug in SPARQL syntax test suite

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:35:29 -0500
Message-ID: <50D07F31.6040204@thefigtrees.net>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
OK by me

On 12/18/2012 6:06 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> I think we should remove them altogether - leaving them in there invites questions.
>
> - Steve
>
> On 18 Dec 2012, at 10:12, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18/12/12 10:10, Polleres, Axel wrote:
>>> How about - for now - commenting them out in the
>>> turtle (with a comment why it was removed)?
>> OK but that seems the same as removing them because its not in the triples.
>>
>> It's already commented out (with reason) in the manifest, but that does not seem to be enough.
>>
>> 	Andy
>>
>>> Axel
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com]
>>>> Sent: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2012 10:54
>>>> To: SPARQL Working Group
>>>> Subject: Fwd: possible bug in SPARQL syntax test suite
>>>>
>>>> We ought to remove inactive tests!
>>>>
>>>>        Andy
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: possible bug in SPARQL syntax test suite
>>>> Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:36:52 +0000
>>>> Resent-From: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
>>>> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:36:14 +1300
>>>> From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@gmail.com>
>>>> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
>>>>
>>>> In running the syntax tests over the latest update of the SPARQL test suite, I
>>>> encountered the following positive test, which fails for me:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/qname-
>>>> escape-01.rq
>>>>
>>>> The query is the following:
>>>>
>>>> PREFIX og: <http://ogp.me/ns#>
>>>> SELECT * WHERE {
>>>>        ?page og:audio\:title ?title
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> As far as I can tell, this test case is out of date: colons in prefixed
>>>> localnames are no longer to be escaped, and grammar production PN_LOCAL_ESC
>>>> (see http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#rPN_LOCAL_ESC)
>>>> does no longer contain the ':' character as a legal value for escaping.
>>>>
>>>> There is a negative syntax test which covers exactly the same issue:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syn-bad-
>>>> pname-06.rq
>>>>
>>>> Query:
>>>>
>>>> PREFIX : <http://example/>
>>>> SELECT *
>>>> {
>>>>     :a :b :c\:z .
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Clearly, these two tests are contradicting each other, and I suspect that the
>>>> first one should be removed.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jeen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 14:35:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT