W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

RE: Minutes from today and Telco Agenda for the next two week

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:44:52 +0100
To: "sandro@w3.org" <sandro@w3.org>, "birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de" <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE801581503C108@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
I think we should discuss whether we are happy with coverage with these tests.
As Chime reports, we can probably approve
 #rif01
 #rif03
 #rif04
 #rif06
And have 2 implementations passing those. However, we miss #rif02 and #rif05

while I understand we can go without rif02 (since it uses rif in RDF which is only a note),
I feel a bit uneasy about going without rif05. Any chance we can have a second implementation
passing rif05 within the next week?

Best,
Axel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org]
> Sent: Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2012 13:31
> To: birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
> Cc: Polleres, Axel; public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Minutes from today and Telco Agenda for the next two week
>
> On 12/10/2012 01:59 PM, Birte Glimm wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we have our institute's Christmas party tomorrow starting at 4pm, but
> > I'll take my MiFi and try to connect from there. If I can't get it to
> > work, I am happy to vote for publishing GSP and Protocol as PR as
> > planned. I hope I manage to vote in person, but just to be sure....
>
> Given the emails from you and Chime about ER tests passing, it looks to
> me like we're ready for ER to go to PR as well.   Do you agree, or is
> there something I'm missing?
>
>          -- Sandro
>
> > Birte
> >
> > On 4 December 2012 17:10, Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com> wrote:
> >> Minutes form today’s Telco are out at
> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-12-04

> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> As stated today, next week we aim to vote for GSP and Protocoll and
> >> in two weeks we aim to vote for Entailment.
> >>
> >> The respective Agendas are already online at:
> >>
> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-12-11

> >>
> >>   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-12-18

> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> comments welcome, if you miss anything there!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Axel
> >>
> >>
> >
> >

Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 12:45:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT