Re: Regrets. Re: SPARQL TC 2012-12-04

regrets too,

also conflicting meeting :(

sorry,

Carlos

On Tuesday 04 December 2012 08:22:34 Matthew Perry wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I won't be able to make the TC today. I have a conflicting meeting.
> 
> Thanks,
> Matt
> 
> On 12/4/2012 2:21 AM, Axel Polleres wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > 
> > Looking over the last two weeks' minutes, I think we have to talk 
about
> > the following things:
> > 
> > 1) review ACTIONs
> > 
> > 2) decide a plan when to vote for PR/Rec, my impression is:
> >     Protocol: Exit criterion is met as per
> >     http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-20#resolution_3 
--> 
> >     Ready to vote for PR
> >     GSP: Exit criterion is met as per
> >     http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-27#resolution_3 
--> 
> >     Ready for PR
> >     Entailment: Exit criterion is met for all but RIF Entailment as per
> >     
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-27#resolution_2>     
> >     -->  2 alternatives:
> >           a) we go to PR now and makr RIF Entailment as informative
> >           b) we give it another week or two, but define a clear 
roadmap
> >           what to be done when>           
> >              (e.g. additional RIF test cases by next week ready for
> >              approval, passed by two engines by>              
> >                    in two weeks means we make RIF entailment 
normative,
> >                    otherwise, we leave RIF entailment as informative)
> > 
> > 3) As for the docs already in PR, I see not comments or issues that 
keep
> > us from progressing to REC, but probably we want to go to REC 
with all
> > docs at the same time.
> > 
> > My goal would be to vote for PR for the missing docs either next 
week or
> > in two weeks (also pending availability in two weeks, e.g. I am 
afraid, I
> > am at risk already for 18th, os personally).
> > 
> > Please let me know if I missed anything!
> > 
> > best,
> > Axel

Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 14:04:37 UTC