W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: URGENT SPARQL - please check diffs and changelogs on pubs!

From: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 21:53:51 -0500
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: SPARQL WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <47192527F9044D82A441A454557769C8@gmail.com>
I've checked  

d11 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20121108  (Looks good)

and I'm (now) looking over 

d09 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-entailment-20121108 

-- 
Chime Ogbuji
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com)


On Tuesday, November 6, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:

> The publications pass all the automated tests, but I may well have 
> broken something in the process of getting them there. So please check 
> the color-coded diff linked from each one (it's diff.html), showing the 
> changes since the last publication. And make sure that roughly lines 
> up with #changelog for each one. If it doesn't, then go ahead and edit 
> the changelog, or fix whatever else you need to. From the editors draft 
> to what's in the publication location, some rewrite scripts are done -- 
> if the ED is fine and what's published is broken, be sure to let me know.
> 
> A few notes on the specific documents are below.
> 
> Please confirm which documents you've checked, until we have at least 
> one editor checking each. HOPEFULLY that will be before about noon ET 
> on Wednesday -- otherwise we might have to slide the publication date 
> another five days. :-(
> 
> -- Sandro
> 
> 
> === d01 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-overview-20121108
> 
> Nothing special.
> 
> 
> 
> === d02 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-query-20121108
> 
> Please confirm my re-phrasing of the red box about rdf:langstring. We
> can't call it "at risk" any more, going to PR. A pedantic reading of
> W3C practice might say we can't using rdf:langstring in a REC until
> RDF 1.1 Concepts is at least in PR, but I'm comfortable with the text
> I proposed here.
> 
> 
> 
> === d03 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-update-20121108
> 
> changed rIRIref to rIRIREF
> changed [r]VarOrIRIref to [r]VarOrIri
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#templatesWithBNodes doesn't work, but
> it's okay because this does:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-query-20121108/#templatesWithBNodes
> 
> 
> 
> === d04 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-service-description-20121108
> 
> Nothing special.
> 
> 
> === d05 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-federated-query-20121108
> 
> Nothing special.
> 
> 
> 
> === d06 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-results-json-20121108
> 
> Nothing special.
> 
> 
> 
> === d07 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PR-sparql11-results-csv-tsv-20121108
> 
> I don't know how to run ReSpec from the command line, so I just made
> the editors draft manually be a PR for now. Lame, I know. If you
> edit this, let me know -- the change wont be picked up automatically.
> 
> 
> 
> === d08 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PER-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20121108
> 
> Someone should make sure the errata are addressed. I changed the xsl
> links so we can fix things after publication, at least, but I don't have 
> any extra
> brain cells to think about the errata right now.
> 
> 
> 
> === d09 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-entailment-20121108
> 
> Nothing special.
> 
> 
> 
> === d10 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-protocol-20121108
> 
> Nothing special.
> 
> 
> === d11 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20121108
> 
> Nothing special. 
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 02:54:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT