W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: aggregate test case typo

From: Paul Gearon <pgearon@revelytix.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:30:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOQ8B2EVaW7nKVEP858qOYJRRNL_qg2YNEbsDbVAGkPaWvw4rQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Seconded.

(I know you said to speak up if you disagree, but I approve of the change)

Paul

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> Please speak up if you disagree with:
>
> PROPOSED: Update the .srx file for :agg-empty-group to include the ?x
> variable in the head section & re-approve the test
>
> Lee
>
>
> On 10/24/2012 11:59 AM, Gregory Williams wrote:
>>
>> Gunnar Grimnes mentioned to me on irc that he noticed something strange in
>> the :agg-empty-group aggregate test. The query projects ?x (the aggregate
>> grouping var) and ?max (the result of the MAX aggregate), but the results
>> file only has ?max in the srx <head> section.
>>
>> Andy and I both agree that this is wrong, and the results file should also
>> include <variable name="x">. However, the test has already been approved, so
>> probably needs WG consensus on fixing it.
>>
>> thanks,
>> .greg
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 16:30:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT