- From: Paul Gearon <pgearon@revelytix.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:30:11 -0400
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Seconded. (I know you said to speak up if you disagree, but I approve of the change) Paul On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: > Please speak up if you disagree with: > > PROPOSED: Update the .srx file for :agg-empty-group to include the ?x > variable in the head section & re-approve the test > > Lee > > > On 10/24/2012 11:59 AM, Gregory Williams wrote: >> >> Gunnar Grimnes mentioned to me on irc that he noticed something strange in >> the :agg-empty-group aggregate test. The query projects ?x (the aggregate >> grouping var) and ?max (the result of the MAX aggregate), but the results >> file only has ?max in the srx <head> section. >> >> Andy and I both agree that this is wrong, and the results file should also >> include <variable name="x">. However, the test has already been approved, so >> probably needs WG consensus on fixing it. >> >> thanks, >> .greg >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 16:30:38 UTC