W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

RE: Deprecation of 'Integer' production in SPARQL 1.1

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:43:56 +0200
To: "andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE80149E40D97BD@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
> I think it is better to record this item but publish as-is,
> which is the grammar the tests are being run against.

+1

Axel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2012 10:24
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Deprecation of 'Integer' production in SPARQL 1.1
>
> Thomas,
>
> Your right - it's not needed any more but it is harmless.
>
> However, removing it would change the numbering so it is not
> a point change.
>
> I think it is better to record this item but publish as-is,
> which is the grammar the tests are being run against.
>
>       Andy
>
> On 05/10/12 16:19, Thomas Visel wrote:
> > Between the May 2011 and July 2012 versions of the SPARQL 1.1 spec,
> > the /Pathmod/ production was revised.  It previously referenced the
> > /Integer/ production (now on line 97) below.  After the
> revision, the
> > latter production is no longer referenced (July 2012 numbering):
> >
> > /[97] //Integer/ = /INTEGER
> > <http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#rINTEGER>/
> >
> > If this is so, the /Integer/ production should be removed.
> >
> > My regards,
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > Algebraix Data
> >
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 09:44:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT