W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

RC-2 resolution

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:21:43 -0400
Message-ID: <506B4CD7.8080800@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I talked to Greg, and we looked more closely at Richard's latest 
suggestion. In it, he includes a "minimal option":

"[T]he minimal option would be to encourage text/plain error messages by providing*only*  text/plain examples (currently there's one for text/plain and one for HTML)"

Given the lack of experience and consensus, Greg and I feel that Richard's suggestion here is acceptable, and we plan to modify the protocol editor's draft accordingly. Please speak up if you're not happy with this resolution.

Also, please take a look at this draft response which I'd propose we 
send to Richard:

After several more discussions, it remains clear that we still have a lack of consensus on this topic and given our group's dwindling timeline, we have no further time to devote to this issue. To that end, we've removed the examples that encouraged using the HTTP status message. We've also adopted your "minimal option", and adjusted the error examples to all use text/plain responses.

Please let us know if this satisfactorily addresses your comments.

On behalf of the SPARQL WG

Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 20:22:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:07 UTC