W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: draft response to Peter Wharer 2

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:43:21 -0400
Message-ID: <506B27B9.5060008@thefigtrees.net>
To: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuilaranda@gmail.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
I made some small edits. It's ok with me as is.

Anyone else?

Lee

On 10/2/2012 1:37 PM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> I updated the response.
>
> cheers,
>
> Carlos
>
> On Tuesday 02 October 2012 13:29:03 Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> I don't think that we have consensus that we would want a way to
> specify
>> the dataset for a SERVICE call, so I would weaken that part of your
>> response a bit. Perhaps you could say something like that the group
>> opted for the current design for simplicity, and hopes to learn more
>> about how datasets interact with federated query from implementation
>> experience in order to inform future standardization?
>>
>> Lee
>>
>> On 10/2/2012 11:59 AM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> here you can find a drafted response for Peter Warer:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PW2
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>>
>>> Carlos
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 17:43:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT