W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: draft response to Peter Wharer 2

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:29:03 -0400
Message-ID: <506B245F.3090101@thefigtrees.net>
To: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuilaranda@gmail.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Hi Carlos,

I don't think that we have consensus that we would want a way to specify 
the dataset for a SERVICE call, so I would weaken that part of your 
response a bit. Perhaps you could say something like that the group 
opted for the current design for simplicity, and hopes to learn more 
about how datasets interact with federated query from implementation 
experience in order to inform future standardization?


On 10/2/2012 11:59 AM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:
> Dear all,
> here you can find a drafted response for Peter Warer:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PW2
> cheers,
> Carlos
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 17:29:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:07 UTC