W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Manually checking entailment tests (ACTION-685) - part1

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:52:59 +0200
To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE80149E32F5CB0@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
Hi,

Since we only have one passing implementation so far, in order to be able to approve the entailment tests, I scanned them manually
as per http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/#sparql11-entailment

bind01 ... looks ok
bind02 ... looks ok
bind03 ... looks ok
bind04 ... looks ok
bind05 ... looks ok

bind06 ... looks ok, but why do we need both bind06, and bind01 (seems the only diff is the select clause)

bind07 ... don't understand, the bind07.srx file has no bindings for z at all. shouldn't this have for each ?o two entries, one binding z to o+1
and one to o+2?!

bind08 ... looks ok

lang ... looks ok, small remark: why is it called "lang" whereas the mf:name says "Literal lang test 2", I suppose because "lang test 1" is actually :plainLit?

owlds01 ... loooks ok
owlds02 ... loooks ok

paper-sparqldl-Q1 ... looks ok, it would be nice to have an RDFS variant of thant one that does NOT return owl:Nothing, additionally.

paper-sparqldl-Q2 ... looks ok


------------------------------------
Unfortunately, I didn't get to look further at the moment, since I have to run for a meeting now.
If I get further before the TelCo, I'll continue here.


best,
Axel


Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich
CT RTC BAM CON-AT
Siemensstraße 90
1210 Wien, Österreich
Tel.: +43 51707-36983
Mobil: +43 664 88550859
mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com

Firma: Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich; Rechtsform: Aktiengesellschaft; Firmensitz: Wien; Firmenbuchnummer: FN 60562 m; Firmenbuchgericht: Handelsgericht Wien; DVR: 0001708
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 12:53:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT