RE: agenda reminder for tomorrow...

Thanks, Olivier, errors should be fixed now on CVS, 
i.e., ut:data added in mf:result in manifest.ttl and missing ";" added
in .ru's ...

> Concerning insert-data-same-bnode2.ru I prefer that the scope 
> of  bnode _:b be one insert data  and hence that the 
> generated bnodes be different.
> The reason is that if you execute the two insert data using 
> one query or using two queries, the result is the same. Also 
> it is more uniform with insert where.

 ...As the emails so far show, both opinions ("scope per operation" 
and "scope per request") can be argued for. Think we have to 
discuss this in the group.

Talk to you later, best regards,

Axel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Corby [mailto:Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr] 
> Sent: Dienstag, 02. Oktober 2012 09:19
> To: Polleres, Axel; public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: agenda reminder for tomorrow...
> 
> On 10/01/2012 10:37 PM, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> > b) we can reach agreement on the four new suggested test cases in 
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/
> >        :insert-data-same-bnode
> >        :insert-data-same-bnode2
> >        :insert-where-same-bnode
> >        :insert-where-same-bnode2
> >   and have confirmation of at least one more implementation
> 
> There are syntax errors:
> a ";" is missing in these 2 tests after the second "INSERT"
> 
> :insert-where-same-bnode
> :insert-where-same-bnode2
> 
> In addition, the results proposed in the manifest for these 2 
> tests are not correct because in the result graph there must 
> still be the input data that have been loaded (ut:data 
> <insert-where-same-bnode-pre.ttl>)
> 
> Concerning insert-data-same-bnode2.ru I prefer that the scope 
> of  bnode _:b be one insert data  and hence that the 
> generated bnodes be different.
> The reason is that if you execute the two insert data using 
> one query or using two queries, the result is the same. Also 
> it is more uniform with insert where.
> 
> 
> Olivier
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 07:50:50 UTC