W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2012

RE: 2 New INSERT DATA test cases (was: Test case proposal in the context of RV-10: insert-data-same-bnode)

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:32:15 +0200
To: "andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "sandro@w3.org" <sandro@w3.org>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE801463C6F5D46@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
> Maybe it would be better to stick with the approved test
> suite and associated reports that we have for the meeting next week?

I understand that we can approve more test cases and amend our test suite
also after PR (or at least, I haven't seen anything which contradicts this), right?
Sandro?

If that's ok, then I am fine with Andy's suggestion to leave them out for the
implementation reports next week, but would still be happy if we had
another implementation reporting to pass them and if we could approve them
next week. (just to ensure that nobody objects afterwards with the behavior tested)

Best,
Axel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 13:54
> To: Polleres, Axel
> Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: 2 New INSERT DATA test cases (was: Test case
> proposal in the context of RV-10: insert-data-same-bnode)
>
> ARQ passes these new tests.
>
> However, they will not be in the EARL report for ARQ and others.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/
>
> Maybe it would be better to stick with the approved test
> suite and associated reports that we have for the meeting next week?
>
>       Andy
>
> On 25/09/12 21:40, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> > Note that I added another variant of that test case for
> approval now which uses two INSERT DATAs in one request, i.e.
> >
> > 1)
> >
> >
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/in
> > sert-data-same-bnode.ru
> > shall test the behavior of
> >     INSERT DATA { GRAPH :g1  { _:b :p :o }
> >                GRAPH :g2  { _:b :p :o } }
> >
> > 2)
> >
> >
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/in
> > sert-data-same-bnode2.ru
> > shall test the behavior of
> >   INSERT DATA { GRAPH :g1  { _:b :p :o } } ;
> >   INSERT DATA { GRAPH :g2  { _:b :p :o } }
> >
> >
> > Axel
>
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2012 12:32:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT