W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: error reporting

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:07:45 -0400
Message-ID: <50644191.2000804@thefigtrees.net>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 9/27/2012 7:40 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 26/09/12 01:13, Arthur Keen wrote:
>> Having a standard way to report errors makes sense in general and would
>> help newcomers (like Algebraix) in the market, by increasing
>> interoperability with existing client libraries and applications.
>>   However we agree that it would be risky to add it to the spec right at
>> the end of the process and we  do not wish to hold up the
>> standardization process for SPARQL 1.1, however we ask that error
>> messages be considered in subsequent standardization activity beyond
>> SPARQL 1.1
>
> The issue I see is that SPARQL exists in a wider context of standards 
> and code.
>
> HTTP is widely (!) deployed and well understood.  Many client-side 
> toolkits exist to work with it.
>
> Reuse is good. Adding additional mechanisms is good to make the system 
> better for one purpose (SPARQLing) but comes with a cost of making 
> general web frameworks toolkits less suitable for app building and 
> adds to web developer overload.  This cost is something we all (self 
> included) tend to underplay when we are in the midst of a technical 
> design.
>

I don't think this particular use case is well-understood in HTTP, is 
it? Is there a standard understanding for how to report (detailed) 
errors over HTTP with respect to media types?

Lee


>     Andy
>
>
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2012 12:08:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT