W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Discussion on RDF compliance of SPARQL Construct

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:27:32 +0100
Message-ID: <50643824.1030600@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
The wiki has the material for the UC&R document:

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Category:Features
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Category:Design

but I don't see anything on CONSTRUCT modification for beyond-RDF.

There is a critical problem with doing this with the results format 
which is outside of SPARQL.

So either it's API issue (and so not part of the standard) or the 
CONSTRUCT result is going to be serialized in some way.  All RDF formats 
have the "no literals as subjects" restriction (OK - so some parsers may 
be lax about it but they are knowing outside the spec).

If the requester is going to change the server, the query engine and the 
client then, sure, but it's outside of spec space.

	Andy

On 27/09/12 00:01, Arthur Keen wrote:
> I am trying to locate the discussion a little while back about relaxing
> RDF compliance on SPARQL construct.  The requester wanted to be able to
> create triples in construct that did not comply with RDF, for example
> the rule on literals in the subject position.  I have looked through the
> issues and can't find it.   Would appreciate it if someone could point
> me to it.
>
> Thanks
> Arthur
>
>
>
> Arthur Keen, PhD.
> Vice President of Products and Strategy
> 9601 Amberglen Blvd, Suite 119, Austin, TX 78729
> OFFICE: 512.651.5834 x1126
> MOBILE: 512.433.9537 | Fax: 512.651.5844
>
Received on Thursday, 27 September 2012 11:28:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT