W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Request review of SPARQL 1.1 Query Last Call by August 21, 2012

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:05:54 -0400
Message-ID: <503395C2.1000009@thefigtrees.net>
To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hello again, dear RDF Working Group,

Could you please let us know if the RDF WG intends to complete a review 
of the SPARQL 1.1 Query LCWD? We'd appreciate a response before we 
decide to advance the specification, even if there will not be a formal 
review.

many thanks,
Lee

On 7/31/2012 10:53 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Hello RDF Working Group,
>
> The SPARQL Working Group has published a Last Call Working Draft of 
> SPARQL 1.1 Query at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/
>
> The SPARQL Working Group has assembled a test suite and begun to 
> collect implementation reports, and we expect to transition this 
> specification directly to Proposed Recommendation upon successful 
> completion of a Last Call that lasts until August 21, 2012.
>
> We'd kindly like to ask the RDF WG to review this Last Call document 
> and send us any comments that you might have. If you'd prefer not to 
> review this document, please let us know that as well.
>
> In particular, we'd appreciate any input on:
>
>   * http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#func-datatype specifies that
>     the DATATYPE() function should return rdf:langString for
>     language-tagged literals. This is currently an at-risk portion of
>     the SPARQL document as we monitor RDF WG progress.
>   * http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#grammar specifies grammar
>     changes intended to align with RDF WG changes to Turtle. This is
>     currently an at-risk portion of the SPARQL document.
>
>
> thanks very much,
> Lee
> on behalf of the SPARQL WG
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2012 14:06:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT