W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Old comments without responses

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:48:16 +0200
To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE80141DCCA6482@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
Looking through older comments without replies - short summary, might be useful for the Telco:
 
 JL-4 (Sandro?): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012May/0009.html
Indirect Graph Identification (Graph Store Protocol)... Think I remember the last time we discussed it we assigned it to Sandro.
 
(Chime?) JC-4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Feb/0015.htm
 + JC5 
plus Eric following up:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Feb/0016.html
Also on GSP... These look outdated in the sense that the paragraph in question seems to be gone, but is the issue URI/vs IRI solved?

(chime) KK-13  ... has  a draft repsonse 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:KK-13
and one approval from Andy.Looked quickly over it, and (despite I am not really into this matter) looks ok to me as well... ready to send?


(SteveH?) Looking at DBeckett-1
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Dec/0001.html
it seems to be largely outdated.
I ask myself whether - instead of the long draft reply at 
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DBeckett-1
we shouldn't just answer that - to our knowledge all the items have been addresses in the LC document and we have
coverage in the test suite now?
 
(Lee) The following comments on protocol also appear to be open:
Demairy-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011May/0010.html
RC-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Sep/0002.html

(Lee) SA-1 "performance "bug in xsl script" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0007
... Seems not really critical path, but maybe should be answered. We might want to put this fix in an erratum for http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-XMLres/, but it seems not strictly necessary to me to change the XSL script.

Best,
Axel

-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres 
Siemens AG Österreich 
Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research & Technologies 
CT T CEE 
 
Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983 
Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859
Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com 
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 13:48:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT