W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Responses for DB-26 and DB-27

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:40:34 +0100
Message-ID: <50180A82.8020802@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org

On 31/07/12 16:20, Paul Gearon wrote:
> Hi,
> I have written responses for DB-26 and DB-27:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DB-26


> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DB-27

(I changed "triple will deleted" to "triple will be deleted")


> I'll send them out once someone gets an opportunity to look over them.
> Neither are particularly large.
> Meanwhile, I have sent DB-5. This was languishing for some time while
> waiting for an extra comment, but it should be fine as no concerns
> were raised.
> Regards,
> Paul


PS in the case of DB-26, adding to the futures list is appropriate.

However, I do not believe that other requests should automatically be 
dumped there when they are vague concepts with no clear point or 
indirect points about other specs.  Specs are specs first and foremost 
and build on other specs; they are not tutorials about other 
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 16:41:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:07 UTC