W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Status of work on BIND

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:38:12 +0100
Message-ID: <4FF2F5C4.3080800@epimorphics.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org


On 03/07/12 12:53, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 12:12 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> This is now complete.
>
> Great.   Does this mean that, from your perspective, it's ready for LC?
> Or is there more you still need to do to the document?
>
> (We can talk about this more in the telecon, but I need to report on the
> current schedule of the WG, and my understanding is this is one of the
> critical path items.)

It was and it isn't :-)

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/To_PR#Query_.28LC.29

I have made a list to discuss in the TC but I'll capture it here. I went 
over the To_PR page and I don't have anything that needs doing so we are 
now into reviews for 3LC.

There are some edits:

  + nested aggregates

  +defn of MIN, MAX and SAMPLE could do with defining for the "no 
elements" case.  The defn is right (no definition => error, which is 
right) but it would be better to say it explicitly.

The status changes are up-to-date.

Things needing reviewing are:

1/ Property path (Paul's review outstanding; Matt has done his)
2/ VALUES review and WG agreement for the change
3/ BIND review

and that covers everything changed for 3LC.  if someone wants to do a 
whole doc review, great but my sense from last time was that it was not 
absolutely necessary.

Axel may wish to add something on scope text but as far as I'm concerned 
the latest changes address the matter to my satisfaction.

Beyond 3LC for query,

   + ACTION-389 (populate the function namespace page) needs doing.
   + reference cleaning

	Andy

>
>     -- Sandro
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2012 13:38:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:48 GMT