Re: ACTION-598 Open comments

Sorry, I sent the previous one incomplete... next try.

In the end of the last telco, we started looking into unassigned comments... which should be tackled/assigned.
In completion of ACTION-598, here a short summary of Open Comments (ordered alphabetically by assigned WG member, unassigned in the end):

Andy:

 DB-20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Feb/0009.html (response drafted)
 SA-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Feb/0007.html (response drafted)
 DRD-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Feb/0026.html
 JB-9 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Feb/0025.html (response drafted)

Carlos:
 FS-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jun/0017.html
 DBeckett-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Dec/0001.html

Chime:
 KK-13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Mar/0011.html
 JC-4(unasigned)  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Feb/0015.html ... this seems to be obsoleted, Chime?
 KK-8 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Feb/0003.html
 KK-9 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Feb/0009.html (that one actually was replied personally by Chime already, but no ack. Chime, can we count that one replied?
 KK-6 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jan/0005.html
 GR-3 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jan/0006.html
 SJ-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011May/0033.html (response drafted)
 DB-3 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011May/0029.html (response drafted)
 AL-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jun/0000.html (response drafted)
 JL-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Nov/0048.html
 PF-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jan/0008.html

Eric:
 JC-5(unasigned)  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Feb/0017.html ... seems there was some communication between eric and Jeremy preceeding that one, Eric?

Greg:
AL-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2009Jul/0004.html ... seems there was a response, but not clearly marked as WG reply and not marked on the comments page?

Lee:
 Demairy-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011May/0010.html
 MLR-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Apr/0000.html
 SA-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0007

Paul:
 DB-5 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0017 (response drafted)
 PA-3 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Feb/0011.html

Steve:
 BT-3 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Oct/0020.html (response drafted)

unassigned:
GR-4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jan/0031.html
RC-1 (protocol, postponed until protocol has settled) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Sep/0001.html
RC-2 (protocol, postponed until protocol has settled) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Sep/0002.html
DB-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2009Jul/0006.html
SG-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2009Jun/0000.html 
SG-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2009Jun/0001.html
DW-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Dec/0015.html
JP-4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jan/0009.html (lots of discussion on the list)
JP-5 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Feb/0006.html (lots of discussion on the list)
WM-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Feb/0029.html (should be treated together with JP-4)
JB-10 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Feb/0030.html (should be treated together with JP-4)